1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Continued from LIC9099
Allegation: Facility restraining residents in care
Interview with W2, stated believes facility is restraining resident (R1) to prevent (R1) from wandering. Interview with W2 also stated facility advised W2 it’s for R1’s safety and will prevent falls. Interviews S1, S2 and S3 stated R1 were admitted to the facility with a wheelchair that had a belt attached to it. Interview with S1 stated R1’s daughter advised S1 the belt was in place to prevent R1 from falling. S1 stated that prior to R1 moving into facility R1 was hospitalized and was a fall risk. Interview with S2 and S3 stated when R1 was admitted to the facility the wheelchair had the belt attached to it and staff were told by R1’s daughter it’s there to prevent R1 from falling.
Based on LPAs observations and interviews which were conducted and record reviews, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegations are found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8), are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D.
Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report and appeal rights were given to Shahid Siddiqui.
|