1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | 5 out of 5 staff disagreed with the allegation (S1-S5). Staff (S5) stated that the facility arranged transportation for R1 to return home, as well as at least three additional trips. S5 further stated that on one occasion, R1 declined an arranged trip. Records review revealed the following: Physician’s Report dated 07/24/2025 indicates (R1) is unable to leave the facility unassisted due to mental and physical condition. Preplacement Appraisal dated 09/24/2025 states R1 is not functionally capable of using a walker or leaving/entering the facility unassisted. Facility Acknowledgement record dated 07/29/26 at 12:45 PM documents that R1 voluntarily left the facility against recommendation, accepted responsibility while away, and agreed to arrange their own transportation unless otherwise coordinated. Based on the evidence gathered, interviews conducted and records reviewed, although the allegation “Staff did not allow the resident to leave the facility may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegation is unsubstantiated.
Regarding the allegation “Staff did not ensure that the resident's dental care needs were met”. Interviews conducted revealed the following: 9 out of 10 residents disagreed with the allegation (R2-R10), while 1 out of 10 agreed with the allegation (R1). (R1) admitted to being seen by dentist provided by the facility and not agreeing with their assessment. 5 out of 5 staff (S1-S5) disagreed with the allegation. (S5) stated that (R1) was seen for an annual dental exam on 11/10/2025 additionally refused dental services on 05/28/2026. Records review revealed the following: Facilities Dental visit summary record dated 05/28/2026 indicates (R1) refusing services recommended by dentist. Based on the evidence gathered, interviews conducted, observations, and records reviewed, although the allegation “Staff did not ensure that the resident's dental care needs were met” may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegation is unsubstantiated.
Regarding the allegation Staff did not provide proper food service to residents in care: It is being alleged that staff is not providing the quality diet resident needs due to medical condition. Interviews conducted revealed the following: 1 out of 10 residents disagreed with the allegation (R1). While 9 out of 10 disagreed (R2-R10). (S1) indicated that they have been following physicians’ orders for (R1) regarding diet. Records review revealed the following: Pre-Placement Appraisal dated 09/24/2025 notes (R1) require a RENAL DIET (“RENAL” under Special Diet), which is a kidney friendly plan limiting sodium, potassium, and phosphorus (and sometimes protein or fluids). Ref: Institute of Health.
Please see (LIC9099-C) for report continuation. |