1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | In November of 2025, R1's family held a party for R1 and hired Entertainer/Videographer Polly Wolly for R1's birthday celebration and to video record the event. In the video recordings, the people identified by staff and witnesses are not residents of the facility, they are R1's family members who agreed to be video recorded and participated with holding the recording device. The facility staff did not take videos of R1. The facility staff did not hire the entertainer, the family of R1 hired the videographer. Fifteen of fifteen residents interviewed could not corroborate this, residents are not aware of this incident happening. W2 family of R1 acknowledge hiring the entertainer but were not aware of the content of the videos posted. Based on records reviewed and interviews conducted, Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated.
Regarding the allegation: Staff did not intervene when outside vendor took videos and pictures of residents without consent. It is alleged that the facility staff did not stop outsider vendor from taking pictures and videos of the residents without their consent. Three of three staff deny this, according to S1 the entertainment company was not hired by the facility. The entertainment company was hired by R1’s family and R1’s family sought facility permission to hold the party in the patio area of the facility. According to W2 and W3, all the people shown in the videos were R1 and R1’s family and no other resident or staff. W2 stated having hired the entertainer for R1’s birthday party and was not aware of the content posted on internet platforms. Therefore, the facility staff are not responsible for video and pictures taken of R1 and R1’s family by an outside vendor approved by R1 and their family. Therefore, based on interviews, review of videos and pictures with staff and witnesses, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated.
An exit interview was conducted and copy of this report was provided to Administrator Clemencia Bousheri. |