1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | INVESTIGATION REVEALED THE FOLLOWING:
Allegation: Staff did not provide residents with an eviction notice.
It is alleged that Resident #1 (R1) did not receive an eviction notice. Reports indicate that (R1) was informed that the facility’s license had been revoked and that residents must move to other facilities, without receiving any formal eviction notices. Additional reports claimed the facility was not shutting down, which created inconsistencies in the information provided.
On September 18, 2026, between 1:16 PM and 2:00 PM, the Department interviewed residents identified as Resident #1 through Resident #5 (R1-R5). Five (5) out of five (5) confirmed that they received written notices regarding relocation. Four (4) of the five (5) also reported receiving oral notices from the management team. Resident #1 (R1) stated that they received notices on August 17, 2026, and September 17, 2026, but did not consider them legitimate eviction notices.
On September 18, 2026, between 1:30 PM and 2:30 PM, the Department interviewed staff members identified as Staff #1 and Staff #2 (S1-S2). Two (2) out of the two (2) staff members confirmed that the facility had been placed on a Temporary Suspension Order due to concerns about immediate risks to residents’ health and safety, which required the facility to cease operations immediately. Accordingly, the management initiated emergency relocation procedures rather than standard eviction procedures. All residents received a “Notice of Emergency Relocation” on August 17, 2026. This notice does not conform to the 30-day, or 60-day notice requirements outlined in Title 22 Regulations.
Further review of the Notice of Emergency Relocation (dated 08/17/26 and 09/17/26) revealed that residents and/or their responsible parties received the notice in accordance with Health and Safety Code §1569.525 and the Community Care Licensing Department (CCLD) emergency relocation protocol. Interviews with residents confirmed they received relocation information from facility staff, and management indicated that eviction notices are neither legally required nor appropriate during a Department-ordered emergency closure.
Based on information gathered, there is insufficient evidence supports the allegation mentioned above.
Based on the information collected from the facility inspection, observations, interviews, and records analysis, the Department found no evidence to support the above allegations. The allegations may have happened or are valid, but there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violations occurred. Therefore, the allegations are unsubstantiated.
Reports sent to Licensee Representative Mohsen Abdosaleh by USPS mail and electronic mail. |