1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | It was alleged that residents representative was not informed about the resident’s care. Per interviews with facility, 2 out of 2 staff deny that R1’s responsible party was not informed of R1’s care as R1’s responsible party came to the facility as a result of the facility’s reporting.
It was alleged that staff made a misleading statement regarding resident’s care. Per interviews R1’s responsible party was notified that R1 had a swollen hand, no reason for the injury was provided until R1’s responsible party advised Administrator Kimberly about the “female nurse” that was later determined to be R2.
It was alleged that staff did not ensure residents were fed resulting in weight loss. Per review of facility meal photos sent in November and December 2025, the facility documented R1’s meal consumption. Per review of R1’s physician’s report R1 is able to feed themselves. During today’s visit LPA observed residents eating a meal of chicken, mashed potatoes, green salad, and chopped fruit.
It was alleged that the facility does not provide planned activities. Interviews with 3 out of 6 residents interviewed stated they do not wish to participate in activities. The remaining 3 residents were not oriented to time or space or were not available for interviews. Administrator Kimberly stated activities are offered such as working out, walks outside to the park, coloring and arts/crafts.
Therefore based on the preponderance of evidence through records reviewed ,interviews and observations the allegations Lack of supervision resulting in residents sustaining injuries, Facility did not provide planned activities, Residents were not accorded a safe environment, Resident's representative was not provided access to the resident's record, Resident's representative was not informed about the resident's care, Facility staff made a misleading statement regarding resident's care, Staff did not ensure residents were fed resulting in weight loss meaning that although the allegation may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred.
No deficiencies cited.
An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided. |