1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | R1 previously said things about the staff members that offended R2 multiple times. LPA conducted an interview with Resident #3 (R2), who confirmed R2’s statement.
LPA conducted interviews with two (2) staff members, both of whom confirmed the statements from the residents interviewed. Both staff members confirmed that they were present during the alleged verbal incident between R1 and R2. LPA obtained the staff schedule and confirmed their staff coverage. Both staff members stated that they redirected both R1 and R2, following their facility policy.
LPA conducted a tour of the facility. The facility is a small home with six (6) capacity that has its kitchen and living room in the middle of it. LPA observed that staff members were always in the center of the facility and could always provide care and supervision.
The evidence found during the investigation did not meet the preponderance of evidence standard. Therefore, this allegation is unsubstantiated at this time. A finding that the complaint is UNSUBSTANTIATED means the allegation may have happened or is valid, but there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred.
An exit interview was conducted where a copy of this report was provided.
***LPA left the facility at 12:00 noon and returned at 1:30 PM.
|