1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | R1 called for help, and S1 came into the room. R1 told S1 to call 911, but S1 refused to do so by stating that S1 could be in trouble for calling 911. R1 ultimately called 911 by themselves.
LPA conducted an interview with S1, who denied refusing to call 911 when R1 fell in the room. S1 stated that S1 and a resident went to R1’s room when they heard R1 calling for help. S1 found R1 on the floor and asked if they were OK. S1 told R1 that R1 needed to go to a hospital, but R1 refused to go to a hospital. R1 stated that they were fine and did not need to see a doctor. After helping R1 get back on the bed, S1 asked R1 again to go to a hospital. R1 again refused to go to a hospital, stating that they were fine. S1 added that R1 was an independent resident managing their own medication and schedule their own appointments. LPA conducted an interview with Resident #2 (R2) who went to R1’s room with S1 during R1’s fall incident. R2 confirmed S1’s statement regarding R1’s fall incident.
Due to conflicting information from the parties involved, the evidence found during the investigation did not meet the preponderance of evidence standard. Therefore, this allegation is unsubstantiated at this time. A finding that the complaint is UNSUBSTANTIATED means the allegation may have happened or is valid, but there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred.
An exit interview was conducted where a copy of this report was provided. |