1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | It was learned that the facility does not document or log when the residents use the toilet or is changed other than that residents are checked every two hours. Moreover, during LPA Lee’s facility visits on 04/30/2026, 07/10/2026 and during today’s visit LPA Lee did not observe any incontinence odor in the facility. Therefore, the preponderance of evidence standard has not been met, and the allegation is unsubstantiated.
It was alleged that due to staff neglect, a resident developed sepsis. This investigation consisted of records reviewed, interviews with staff, the residents in care and outside agencies. It was learned that R1 had multiple hospital visits between March and April 2026 due to fluid-filled blisters associated with bullous pemphigoid. Administrator Paramo and S1 stated that R1’s condition continued to worsen despite prescribed treatment. Both reported that R1 frequently removed bandages and scratched the affected areas despite redirection. Administrator Paramo and S1 believed R1 required a higher level of care, and R1 was issued an eviction notice prior to receiving home health services. R1’s home health Registered Nurse (RN) stated that facility staff were adequately managing R1’s wounds. Although R1’s bandages were sometimes wet during wound care visits, the RN considered this normal and did not believe more frequent bandage changes were necessary. The RN also reported observing no signs of infection. On 04/22/2026, R1 appeared to be at baseline; however, on 04/23/2026, R1 was hospitalized and diagnosed with sepsis. Based on interviews and information obtained, facility staff assisted with R1’s wound care, sought a higher level of care, and provided care consistent with the home health RN’s expectations. Although R1 was subsequently diagnosed with sepsis, there is insufficient evidence to establish that facility staff neglect to provide appropriate care or contribute to R1’s condition. Therefore, the preponderance of evidence standard has not been met, and the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this LIC 9099 report was provided to the Administrator Paramo.
|