1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | After being contacted by law enforcement, the authorized representative for R2, prior to being contacted by the facility, called the facility directly to gather additional information regarding R2’s elopement from the facility and current status. Authorized representative questioned the timeliness of the facility notification policy, rather than being called by law enforcement directly. LPA Gould has determined the facility has met requirements for reporting to law enforcement prior to contacting authorized representatives to report and incidents such as elopement. Facility was in process of making notifications when R2’s authorized representative contacted the facility and was able to discuss the circumstances of elopement.
Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. The Department has determined that the allegations of Reporting Requirements are unsubstantiated but if any additional information is received this complaint can be amended and the findings can be changed.
There are no deficiencies cited per California Code of Regulations, TITLE 22.
Exit interview was conducted with facility staff. Appeal Rights were issued, and a copy of this report was left at the facility. |