1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | middle upper back skin tear, nonpitting edema to left upper extremity, and swelling of the left knee. Interview with R1’s responsible party indicated that R1 had a little sore on their “backside”, however, the facility got another bed to relieve pressure and, after the new bed, everything was ok. Interview with R1’s nurse practitioner (NP) indicated that R1 developed a pressure wound on or about April 10, 2026 and began home health services on April 14, 2026, due to the pressure wound. Interview with NP indicated that R1 had a stage 2 wound on their sacrum that was observed during a mobile visit with R1 on April 10, 2026. The facility had informed them that R1 had redness on their bottom and that they needed more cream. Interview with NP also indicated that an order was placed on April 7, 2026 for an alternating pressure mattress for R1. Interview with relevant party indicated that, on March 2, 2026, R1’s primary care physician (PCP) had sent an order for home health services with medication and rehabilitation. Relevant party indicated that on April 20, 2026, April 22, 2026, April 24, 2026, April 27, 2026, April 29, 2026, and May 1, 2026, R1 received home health visits. Relevant party indicated that, on April 28, 2026, R1 had wound care for their upper back, which previously was provided for their lower back. Relevant party indicated that they were unable to provide clarification regarding home health or palliative care notes and would prefer a medical staff to discuss documentation. Interview with NP also provided some unclear dates of service. LPA requested home health records on August 10, 2026, which included intake documentation, assessments, progress notes, and any documentation for the assessment conducted for the palliative care visit. LPA followed up regarding request on August 14, 2026 and August 21, 2026 via email and left voice messages. To date, LPA has not received the records requested.
Interview with R1’s responsible party and Administrator indicated that R1’s responsible party was at the care home everyday to visit R1. Interview with R1’s responsible party indicated that they felt the facility staff were doing a really good job with care and supervision. R1’s responsible party indicated that staff were checking on R1 throughout the day, changing R1’s diaper, and asking if R1 needed anything even when they were visiting. R1’s responsible party indicated that they would visit during different times everyday and there were always at least two (2) staff present and that the owner would be there everyday or every other day as well. R1’s responsible party indicated that they would have taken care of the situation right away if they noticed anything wrong. They had no concerns regarding care and supervision. Interview with the Administrator indicated that they would work the NOC shift and stay with R1 all night, due to R1 wanting staff with them all night. Administrator indicated that R1 was checked every 2 hours and had a bell in their room to notify staff
************************************************Continued on LIC9099-C************************************************** |