1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | (Cont. from LIC-9099A)
Regarding the allegation, interviews reported that dietary allergies are flagged in the computer ordering system, reviewed during staff line-ups, and displayed for cooks and servers. Staff stated that when the garlic concern was reported, the dining team reviewed the ingredients and found no indication that garlic had been added. The resident(R2) with the garlic allergy reported that they could not tell if there was garlic on the food served, that the incident and reaction was minor, and that staff are “very careful” and took appropriate steps after the concern.
Records review of the dining menu items on the date in question contained garlic in limited products, but there was no documentation confirming that garlic was served to the resident or that a dietary plan was violated. The food R2 described eating was not consistent with any food on the menu for the date in question.
LPA observed dining room clean, with allergen sign up warning residents about foods that may contain eggs, shellfish, peanuts, etc. LPA observed Dinning Director demonstrating how when a resident places an order, the allergen warning and what the resident is allergic to will come up. LPA observed this notice in bright red. LPA was informed this gets sent to the back of house staff that prepare the meals as well.
Based upon the information obtained during this investigation, it is determined that the preponderance of evidence was not met to support or corroborate the allegation and therefore deemed unsubstantiated.
An exit interview was conducted with Health Services Administrator Venus Jo, to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee’s Rights (LIC9058 01/16) were provided.
|