1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Continued from LIC9099-A
A review of the call light record revealed that out of 90 calls for service on the AM shift of 03/23/26, call light response time took an average of 8 minutes and 48 seconds.
Because Complainant reports that call light response time is no longer a primary concern and because of conflicting information about call light response times, this allegation is Unsubstantiated
In addition, on 03/25/2026 CCL received a complaint alleging that staff at Ivy Park at “Do not keep the facility clean or sanitary”. Upon LPAs entry into the facility 04/01/2026 and again on 04/20/2026 I observed the facility to be clean, and without odors, in addition I observed multiple housekeepers cleaning and rolling well stocked cleaning carts throughout the property. On 04/20/2026 upon my unannounced entry into R1’s room, I again observed R1’s room to be clean and without odors and observed no troubling signs of improperly stored or disheveled personal medical devices. When R1 was asked if they had help to clean their room, R1 replied, “They (staff) do everything, they vacuum, change my bedding, wipe down things”. Similarly, when R2 was asked about housekeeping, R2 replied, “they will clean my room, vacuum, wash my clothes, sink and bathroom floor”, while R3 indicated, “The housekeeper, they come and do everything, they clean the linen, oh, they do everything!”. This LPA did receive a photo of a personal medical device being partially discarded or stored in a waste basket, but due to conflicting information about whether staff keep the facility clean or sanitary or not, this allegation is unsubstantiated
Additionally, on 03/25/2026 CCL received a complaint alleging that, “Staff do not safeguard residents’ personal items”. The detail of the complaint reads, “The physician ordered a medical device for the resident, but the equipment repeatedly goes missing, leading the complainant to believe staff may be misusing or taking the supplies of the the specialty item.” An interview with R1 had R1 saying, that while at first it was thought that the stocks of the medical device were going missing, they were being stored by the Med-Techs.
An interview with W1 raised uncertainty about where addition supplies of R1’s medical device were going and that W1 did not think they were being thrown away, but that a decision was made that supplies of the device would be stored and locked up by the Med-Tech staff.
Continued on LIC9099-C |