1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Continued from 9099A...
review, facility never received response from doctor. So, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED
Complaint alleges facility staff did not ensure resident's care needs were met. Complainant states staff did not ensure R1 was bathed. During investigation, LPA reviewed facility shower logs dated from February 2026 through May 2026. R1’s is shown to have received showers, sponge baths, and logs also reflects shower refusals. So, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Complaint alleges staff did not repair faulty wire that sparked when moved. Complainant states that R1’s room had an outlet that housed a faulty wire which gave off sparks. During investigation, LPA reviewed photographic evidence presented to LPA. Photographic evidence did not show a spark or any wires exposed from electrical outlet cover and face plate. Face plate shown as slightly off center. During investigation, LPA conducted interviews. Six (6) out of seven (7) staff report never having seen any sparks or faulty wires from the outlet, only that there was sometimes an issue with the switch being in the off position and therefore the items plugged into that outlet would not work, because the switch was in the off position. One (1) staff reported that they didn’t know of any faulty outlet period. So, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Complaint alleges facility did not issue a proper eviction to resident. Complainant states that R1 received an eviction notice from facility. During investigation, LPA conducted interviews. It was reported to LPA that R1’s family are the ones that provided a 30 notice to the facility of their intent to remove the resident. It was also reported to LPA that R1’s care levels exceeded the care that the facility could provide and therefore R1 would be leaving the facility. During investigation, LPA received conflicting accounts of why resident left facility. During the course of investigation, LPA did not receive any documentation or photographic evidence of any eviction notice served to R1 or their responsible party by facility. Facility denies issuing any such eviction notice. So, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Exit interview conducted with Admin and a copy of this report given. |